2 philippines
2025-01-12
WASHINGTON — With some of President-elect Donald Trump’s Cabinet and other presumptive nominees facing an uncertain path to confirmation, some Republicans have considered embracing recess appointments to allow Trump to temporarily fill vacancies without Senate approval. But that approach might come with its own complications. Many GOP senators have hesitated to cede authority over confirmations. With 53 Republican seats, nominees that can’t get majority support shouldn’t proceed, they argue. Former Florida GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz’s withdrawal as Trump’s selection for attorney general, then, would be an example of how the system should work. Other senators have said that if the Democratic minority next year uses delay tactics — of the sort Republicans themselves employed regarding President Joe Biden’s judicial nominees before the Thanksgiving break, for example — Republicans will be more willing to allow recess appointments. “If we in the Senate do our job correctly, we won’t need to worry about a recess appointment,” Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said. “Now, if my Democratic colleagues don’t cooperate, then the issue of a recess appointment may be pertinent.” One less-likely scenario is that Trump proceeds with recess appointments by using an extraordinary and never-before-used constitutional power to force a Senate recess. Nonetheless, any actions taken by those recess appointees could be challenged in court and potentially brought to a stop. There are signs that even the conservative-dominated Supreme Court, with three Trump appointees, would find those moves to be unconstitutional. How recess appointments work The Constitution permits the president to circumvent the confirmation process for vacancies that “happen” during “the Recess of the Senate.” If appointed during a recess, officials could potentially serve until the end of the next session, or in this case, through the end of the 119th Congress. The Congressional Research Service has identified 139 recess appointments made by President Bill Clinton, 171 made by President George W. Bush and 32 made by President Barack Obama. Neither Trump in his first term nor President Joe Biden made any recess appointments. Although not unanimous, there is some sympathy for the recess appointment argument among Senate Republicans. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., offered qualified support, arguing that there’s plenty of recent precedent. “I hope President Trump does at least 33 recess appointments. ... Because Obama did 32. So if anybody thinks that recess appointments are something new and different, you need to kind of study just a couple of administrations back,” Tillis told reporters. But he said recess appointments should be off-limits for Cabinet-level positions. “That should be absolutely off the table,” Tillis said. “These positions are too important and carry too much weight internationally to take a shortcut.” Supreme Court ruling Recess appointments declined under Obama because the Senate began staying in session year-round by convening in brief “pro forma” sessions every three days during break periods, such as the chamber’s summer recess. In 2014, the Supreme Court ruled in National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning that the Constitution allows the president to fill any existing vacancy, but only if the Senate has been in recess for at least 10 days. Under the 2014 ruling, the Senate can choose to allow the president to make recess appointments by agreeing with the House to adjourn for at least 10 days. The court’s decision also left open the possibility for the president to make appointments by forcing a Senate recess. That plan, in theory, would exploit Article 2, Section 3, of the Constitution that allows the president to adjourn Congress “to such Time as he shall think proper” when the two chambers are unable to agree on a time for adjournment. Ed Whelan, an attorney and senior fellow for the Ethics and Public Policy Center, recently explained in National Review how such a scenario could play out. First, the House can adopt a concurrent resolution providing for adjournment of both the House and the Senate for at least 10 days, Whelan wrote. The resolution would not be debatable in the Senate and could be adopted by a majority vote, though opposing senators could attempt to filibuster with amendments and procedural motions. Then, the Senate could choose to adopt the resolution, which would allow time for Trump to make appointments. Or it could reject the resolution, which could allow Trump to assert his constitutional power to adjourn Congress when a “disagreement” exists with respect to the time of adjournment. With the Senate gone for at least 10 days, the president could then begin filling vacancies. Nuclear option Of course, it’s no sure thing the House would even act to adopt a recess resolution. In comments to reporters before Thanksgiving, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., appeared to defer to Senate prerogatives when it comes to presidential nominees, pointing out that “the Senate has advice and consent responsibility under the Constitution. They have to vet candidates, of course, and they will.”’ And with House Republicans expected to hold a razor-thin majority, it’s unclear whether such a resolution could receive enough votes for adoption, even if supported by GOP leadership. Additionally, if the Senate simply rejects or declines to act on a House-originated adjournment resolution, that might not constitute a “disagreement” that Trump could exploit, according to Whelan and other experts. Andy Craig, an adjunct scholar at the libertarian-leaning Cato Institute, wrote that the House and Senate would have to adopt conflicting adjournment resolutions that specify different dates before the president can step in to adjourn them. Simply rejecting the resolution, or refusing to consider it, wouldn’t be enough to trigger the president’s adjournment power, he wrote. James Wallner of the center-right R Street Institute expressed a similar sentiment in a recent social media post, arguing the Senate “can’t have an opinion until it takes action to have one — to disagree.” But with Trump and his own attorneys constantly looking for novel interpretations of executive authority, it’s possible they take the position that a disagreement has occurred anyway. The effectiveness of any recess appointees would almost immediately be cast into doubt, however, as the move could trigger a slew of litigation against agencies led by recess-appointed officials. It could take some time to work its way through the courts, according to Stanford law professor Anne Joseph O’Connell, who said each recess appointee would need to be challenged by a separate plaintiff with standing. “The Supreme Court could then consolidate cases or accept one case and hold the others to be remanded to consider the decision in the case they hear,” she said. Conservative pushback Litigation regarding any potential Trump recess appointees could set the stage for the Supreme Court to invalidate them by taking a more restrictive stance than it did in its 2014 ruling. That case involved an instance of presidential overreach, the court found, when Obama made three recess appointments to the NLRB after concluding that the Senate was unavailable to consider nominations, even though it had convened periodically for pro forma sessions. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the appointments were invalid, and a majority, which included the liberal justices and swing-justice Anthony Kennedy, held that the Senate must be in recess for at least 10 days before the president can make a recess appointment. But the conservative justices strongly disagreed with the majority’s understanding of the Recess Appointments Clause and took a position that Senate Republicans had urged them to adopt. In an amicus brief, the entire Senate Republican Conference during the 113th Congress urged the court to severely curtail the recess appointment power. Among those who signed the brief, 21 are still currently serving in the Senate. Republicans called on the court to hold that the “recess” defined in the Constitution means only the recess that occurs after the Senate ends its regular annual session, and excludes an “intra-session” adjournment, which occurs when the Senate temporarily takes a break during its annual session for various reasons, like a holiday or district work period. They also urged the justices to rule that the president may only fill positions that become vacant during that narrowly defined recess. Obama’s recess appointments, the senators wrote, “cannot be justified by the Recess Appointments Clause without distorting that provision’s text and purpose beyond recognition: The appointments were made neither during ‘the Recess of the Senate,’ but instead in an intrasession adjournment, nor to fill ‘vacancies that ... happen[ed] during the Recess,’ but to preexisting openings.” Additionally, the senators suggested that the Supreme Court should conclude “that the President cannot unilaterally declare the Senate in ‘Recess’ against its will,” as Obama did by refusing to recognize its pro forma sessions. Aligning with Senate Republicans, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote a concurring opinion arguing recess appointment power should allow only appointments during the break between the Senate’s formal annual sessions, and only for vacancies that came into existence during that intermission. Three conservatives currently on the court, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr., joined the late justice’s opinion. Because an attempt by Trump to fill positions with recess appointments would likely occur during the Senate’s regular session and would involve positions that did not become vacant during the recess between annual sessions, the Supreme Court’s current conservative majority might rule that such appointments are unconstitutional. Whelan predicts that the three conservative justices appointed by Trump during his first term — Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — would also be skeptical of a broad recess appointment power that allows intrasession appointments and appointments to preexisting vacancies. “It’s a very safe bet that Justice Gorsuch, Justice Kavanaugh, and Justice Barrett would agree with Scalia if they were looking at the issues afresh. So that would make a six-justice majority among the current members of the Court,” Whelan wrote.StockNews.com lowered shares of Omnicell ( NASDAQ:OMCL – Free Report ) from a buy rating to a hold rating in a report released on Wednesday morning. Other equities research analysts have also recently issued research reports about the stock. JPMorgan Chase & Co. lifted their price target on shares of Omnicell from $37.00 to $44.00 and gave the stock a “neutral” rating in a research report on Thursday, November 21st. Benchmark reaffirmed a “buy” rating and set a $48.00 target price on shares of Omnicell in a report on Wednesday, October 9th. Bank of America reissued a “neutral” rating and issued a $57.00 price target (up previously from $44.00) on shares of Omnicell in a research note on Thursday, October 31st. Wells Fargo & Company lifted their price objective on Omnicell from $30.00 to $41.00 and gave the stock an “equal weight” rating in a research note on Monday, October 14th. Finally, Craig Hallum increased their target price on Omnicell from $45.00 to $64.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research note on Thursday, October 31st. Five investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and two have assigned a buy rating to the stock. According to data from MarketBeat.com, the company currently has an average rating of “Hold” and an average target price of $52.00. Read Our Latest Stock Report on OMCL Omnicell Stock Down 3.9 % Institutional Trading of Omnicell Several institutional investors and hedge funds have recently bought and sold shares of OMCL. Victory Capital Management Inc. boosted its position in Omnicell by 11,982.3% during the third quarter. Victory Capital Management Inc. now owns 1,148,426 shares of the company’s stock worth $50,071,000 after purchasing an additional 1,138,921 shares during the period. Federated Hermes Inc. lifted its stake in shares of Omnicell by 1,113.6% during the 2nd quarter. Federated Hermes Inc. now owns 991,151 shares of the company’s stock worth $26,830,000 after buying an additional 909,480 shares during the last quarter. Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group Inc. bought a new stake in shares of Omnicell during the 3rd quarter worth about $32,721,000. Pacer Advisors Inc. grew its stake in Omnicell by 32.6% in the 2nd quarter. Pacer Advisors Inc. now owns 2,070,434 shares of the company’s stock valued at $56,047,000 after buying an additional 508,789 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Connor Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd. raised its holdings in Omnicell by 750.5% in the 3rd quarter. Connor Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd. now owns 294,037 shares of the company’s stock valued at $12,820,000 after acquiring an additional 259,463 shares during the period. Institutional investors own 97.70% of the company’s stock. Omnicell Company Profile ( Get Free Report ) Omnicell, Inc, together with its subsidiaries, provides medication management solutions and adherence tools for healthcare systems and pharmacies the United States and internationally. The company offers point of care automation solutions to improve clinician workflows in patient care areas of the healthcare system; XT Series automated dispensing systems for medications and supplies used in nursing units and other clinical areas of the hospital, as well as specialized automated dispensing systems for operating room; and robotic dispensing systems for handling the stocking and retrieval of boxed medications. Featured Stories Receive News & Ratings for Omnicell Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Omnicell and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .2 philippines
。
Crown closes its case at bush bash shooting trial, defense to begin WednesdayWest Virginia knocks off No. 3 Gonzaga in overtime
The United States has announced its cooperation with the Lebanese army to enforce a ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon's Hezbollah, without deploying any U.S. combat troops in the area, a senior U.S. official stated on Tuesday. Labeling the ceasefire agreement as "a game-changer," the official indicated it would demonstrate to Hamas militants in Gaza that the conflicts there and in Lebanon were distinct and unconnected. The ceasefire is set to commence on Wednesday following an agreement brokered by the United States and France, as confirmed by U.S. President Joe Biden earlier on Tuesday. (With inputs from agencies.)ATLANTA (AP) — Even when grappling with a four-game losing streak and the uncertainty generated by quarterback Kirk Cousins’ eight interceptions and no touchdown passes in that span, there is some solace for the Atlanta Falcons. They play in the NFC South. There is more good news: The Falcons' next two opponents, the Las Vegas Raiders and New York Giants, are tied for the NFL's worst record at 2-11. Coach Raheem Morris says he is sticking with Cousins for next Monday night's game at Las Vegas. Sunday's 42-21 loss at Minnesota dropped Atlanta to 6-7, one game behind Tampa Bay in the NFC South. The Falcons hold the tiebreaker advantage over the Buccaneers, so if they can take advantage of their cushy closing stretch of games that also includes Washington and Carolina, they could salvage their season. “We’re right in this thing,” right guard Chris Lindstrom said Monday before acknowledging he is “obviously not happy or satisfied with where we’re at." Lindstrom said he maintains "the ultimate belief in what we’re doing and everything that we have going on and everything is still in front of us.” Cousins and the Falcons must solve their red-zone woes to maintain hopes of the team's first playoff appearance since 2017. The Falcons rank eighth in the NFL with 371 yards per game but only 19th with their average of 21.4 points thanks to their persistent problems inside the 20. Even the forgiving NFC South can't make up for the scoring problems caused by penalties, turnovers and other persistent breakdowns. “You can't live with it at all,” Morris said Monday when asked about Cousins' recent streak of interceptions. Even so, Cousins remains the starter as first-round draft pick Michael Penix Jr. awaits his opportunity. “It’s for sure Kirk is our quarterback but I have no hesitations about what our young man has been doing and how he has been preparing and the things he is ready to do,” Morris said. “So if that time ever came I would have a lot of confidence in what Mike is able to do, but Kirk is our quarterback. Kirk is the guy who is going to lead us.” What’s working With four sacks against the Vikings, the Falcons may have finally solved their longtime pass-rush woes. Atlanta had five sacks in a 17-13 loss to the Los Angeles Chargers on Dec. 1, giving the team back-to-back games with at least four sacks for the first time since 2019. Outside linebacker Arnold Ebiketie had one of Sunday's sacks, giving him four for the season. With nine sacks in the last two games, the Falcons have almost doubled their NFL-low total of 10 through their first 11 games. What needs help Even as the pass rush was productive, the Falcons' defense showed a sudden inability to prevent big plays through the air. Atlanta allowed four completions of more than 40 yards as Vikings receivers Jordan Addison and Justin Jefferson combined to catch five scoring passes from Sam Darnold, who did not throw an interception. Morris said the Vikings' strategy was to avoid cornerback A.J. Terrell, “making other people make plays, and we didn’t go out there and make them.” Stock up Running back Tyler Allgeier had nine carries for 63 yards and a touchdown. Even while Bijan Robinson continued to produce with 22 carries for 92 yards and a score, Allgeier re-emerged as a strong complement with his second-highest rushing total of the season. Stock down Cousins has an unhealthy ratio of 17 touchdown passes to 15 interceptions. “Kirk was the guy who led us to the 6-3 record,” Morris said. “We’ve got to find a way to get out of the funk. ... For us, it’s going to be his opportunity to go out and right the ship and he has earned it.” Key number 142: Wide receiver Darnell Mooney set a career high with 142 yards on six catches. It was the third game this season Mooney has led the Falcons in receiving yards. Next steps Former Atlanta quarterback Desmond Ridder is expected to start for the Raiders on Monday night after Aidan O’Connell's knee injury in Sunday's 28-13 loss at Tampa Bay. AP NFL: https://apnews.com/hub/nfl
Nissan and BEAMS' "Denim Tribute" Cars Are Finished With Selvedge Interiors
Saquon Barkley is the NFL's version of Shohei Ohtani: AnalysisArteta wanted his team to prove their European credentials following some underwhelming displays away from home, and the Gunners manager got exactly what he asked for. Goals from Gabriel Martinelli, Kai Havertz, Gabriel Magalhaes, Bukayo Saka and Leandro Trossard got their continental campaign back on track in style following the 1-0 defeat at Inter Milan last time out. A memorable victory also ended Sporting’s unbeaten start to the season, a streak of 17 wins and one draw, the vast majority of which prompted Manchester United to prise away head coach Ruben Amorim. The Gunners had failed to win or score in their two away games in the competition so far this season, but they made a blistering start in the Portuguese capital and took the lead after only seven minutes. Declan Rice fed overlapping full-back Jurrien Timber, who curled a low cross in behind the home defence for Martinelli to finish at the far post. Arsenal doubled their lead in the 20th minute thanks to a glorious ball over the top from Thomas Partey. Saka escaped the clutches of his marker Maximiliano Araujo to beat the offside trap and poke the ball past advancing goalkeeper Franco Israel for Havertz to tap home. It was a scintillating first-half display which completely overshadowed the presence of Viktor Gyokeres in Sporting’s attack. The prolific Sweden striker, formerly of Coventry, has been turning the heads of Europe’s top clubs with his 24 goals in 17 games this season – including a hat-trick against Manchester City earlier this month. But the only time he got a sniff of a run at goal after an optimistic long ball, he was marshalled out of harm’s way by Gabriel. David Raya was forced into one save, tipping a fierce Geovany Quenda drive over the crossbar. But Arsenal added a third on the stroke of half-time, Gabriel charging in to head Rice’s corner into the back of the net. Our second-half goalscorers ❤️ pic.twitter.com/aFCIMffFaK — Arsenal (@Arsenal) November 26, 2024 To rub salt in the wound, the Brazilian defender mimicked Gyokeres’ hands-over-his-face goal celebration. That may have wound Sporting up as they came out after the interval meaning business, and they pulled one back after Raya tipped Hidemasa Morita’s shot behind, with Goncalo Inacio netting at the near post from the corner. Former Tottenham winger Marcus Edwards fired over, as did Gyokeres, with Arsenal temporarily on the back foot. But when Martin Odegaard’s darting run into the area was halted by Ousmane Diomande’s foul, Saka tucked away the penalty. Substitute Trossard added the fifth with eight minutes remaining, heading in the rebound after Mikel Merino’s shot was saved, and Gyokeres’ miserable night was summed up when his late shot crashed back off the post.
SOUTHAMPTON, England (AP) — West Ham goalkeeper Lukasz Fabianski is “alert” and conscious after being taken off the field on a stretcher during the team's 1-0 win at Southampton in the Premier League on Thursday, manager Julen Lopetegui said. The game was delayed for around eight minutes as Fabianski received treatment on the field at St Mary's Stadium. The 39-year-old Polish goalkeeper was hurt in a collision from a corner and was replaced by Alphonse Areola in the 36th minute. Southampton 'keeper Aaron Ramsdale had run the length of the field to check on Fabianski amid worrying scenes. Fabianski was then greeted by applause as he was taken off with an oxygen mask on, but did not need to go to the hospital. “He had one big knock around the head, around the neck and he was not very sure about his actions. Fortunately the news is he is talking, he is alert, he is conscious,” Lopetegui said. “I talk with him. The doctors say that he feels better and well. I am positive with him. He showed he more or less recovered his sense. I am not afraid. We feared but now he is better and it is a positive feeling because we were very worried.” West Ham, which also saw defender Max Kilman go off in the first half, scored through Jarrod Bowen in the 59th. AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccerNittany Lions share the holiday with parents, teammates and coaches
Thinking about living abroad? You’ve come to the right place. International Living just released its Annual Global Retirement Index —which highlights the best places to move (or retire). It’s been a hot topic in the wake of the recent U.S. election, which has sparked a wave of frustration among Americans , with Google showing massive spikes in searches like “how to leave the U.S.,” “best countries for Americans to move to” and “where to move abroad.” Even celebs like America Ferrera, Sharon Stone and Cher have made headlines with their plans to start over in new countries. But for the average American, the question isn’t just about leaving, it’s about finding the right place to go for an affordable, fulfilling life abroad. That’s where International Living’s Global Retirement Index comes in. The report identifies the countries that offer the best combination of affordability, quality of life and opportunities for connection in welcoming communities around the globe. The report is usually released in January, but due to overwhelming demand, the company decided to release it a month early this year. “Historically, there’s a notable uptick in people exploring overseas living opportunities after elections—doesn’t matter who wins,” Jennifer Stevens, executive editor at International Living, told me in an interview. “We wanted to provide timely, updated guidance that reflects the insights we’re hearing from our correspondents on the ground.” And even though the report has “retirement” in the name, that’s not the only audience. “One significant shift we’ve noticed is a growing interest among 35- to 45-year-olds in overseas living options,” says Stevens. “For years, our audience was primarily retirees, as they had the flexibility and savings to move abroad. But now, with the rise of remote work and flexible schedules, this younger demographic is pursuing international living while still maintaining careers.” International Living’s report takes those younger demographics into account. “Many of our correspondents are mid-career professionals and have young families themselves, so they’re evaluating destinations with a broader lens,” says Stevens. “While they may not be fully retired, they’re looking for the same qualities that retirees prioritize in a place to live—things like affordability, safety, infrastructure and vibrant expat communities.” Best Places To Move: The Methodology So how does International Living determine the best destinations for expats each year? The Retirement Index assesses countries across seven key categories: housing, visas and benefits, cost of living, healthcare, development and governance, climate and an affinity rating that reflects the ease of integration into the local community. The process begins with on-the-ground correspondents—expats themselves—who provide real-world data and insights. Housing affordability, for example, is measured by the cost of renting or purchasing in areas where expats typically live, with a focus on comfort and value. Similarly, healthcare is evaluated not only on quality but also on affordability. Cost of living is assessed through detailed questionnaires that account for everyday expenses, from groceries to utilities, to ensure a clear picture of affordability. Visas and benefits are another critical factor. Some countries offer straightforward residency options like Panama’s Pensionado Visa program. Perhaps the most unique feature of the index is the affinity rating, which looks at the human side of relocation. How easy is it to make friends, learn the language or find an English-language movie? Does the expat community feel welcoming? These factors—combined with data on infrastructure, governance and climate—create a comprehensive picture of each country’s appeal. Best Places To Move: The Winner Topping this year’s Global Retirement Index is Panama, a destination that checks all the right boxes for Americans looking to relocate. In last year’s report , Panama ranked fourth. “Panama’s rise to the top this year reflects a combination of factors, including the rising cost of living and housing availability in other popular destinations like Costa Rica, Portugal and Spain,” says Stevens. At the heart of Panama’s appeal is the Pensionado Visa, one of the most generous residency programs in the world. Retirees who can demonstrate a lifetime pension of at least $1,000 per month qualify for permanent residency and access to significant perks. “Panama’s Pensionado Program stands out with exceptional perks, such as discounts on medical services, utilities, transportation and entertainment,” says Stevens. “These benefits significantly reduce retirees’ living expenses while enhancing their quality of life.” But Panama isn’t just for retirees. The country also offers the Friendly Nations Visa, a flexible option for younger expats and families seeking a fresh start. It offers flexible residency through investment or business opportunities. Most couples can live comfortably on $2,500 to $3,000 a month, offerning an accessible path to an upgraded lifestyle. Besides its affordability, Panama has excellent healthcare, particularly in Panama City, where hospitals are equipped with modern technology and English-speaking doctors. The country’s reliable infrastructure includes fast internet and convenient public transportation. And Panama offers diverse lifestyle options to fit any preference, from urban Panama City to beachside Coronado to the cool highlands of Boquete. Best Places To Move: The Top 5 Portugal Coming in at number two, Portugal continues to shine as the top-performing European country in the Index: It was ranked number one for 2023. With its mild year-round climate, stunning coastal landscapes and rich culture, Portugal appeals to retirees and expats alike. “The D7 visa makes it easy to establish residency,” contributor Terry Coles said in the report. “And the cost of living here remains competitive, even in popular areas like the Algarve.” According to International Living, expats typically find their expenses in Portugal run about one-third of what they were in the States. Plus, the country has an excellent public healthcare system and private insurance is also affordable. Costa Rica Costa Rica—last year’s winner—ranks third. The country draws expats with its breathtaking landscapes, diverse climates and the welcoming “Pura Vida” lifestyle. Whether you prefer the beaches, the mountains or a mix of both, Costa Rica offers an incredible quality of life. “There’s a warmth to the people here, and the natural beauty is unmatched,” Bekah Bottone, International Living’s Costa Rica correspondent, said in the report. Costa Rica is also a haven for those looking for eco-friendly living and community. From sustainable tourism to organic markets, it’s a destination that values environmental conservation as much as a laid-back lifestyle. Mexico Mexico, ranked fourth, has a well-established expat community. “Mexico gives you a taste of adventure with the comfort of familiarity,” Bel Woodhouse, International Living’s Mexico correspondent, said in the report. Affordability is a major draw. A one-bedroom apartment near the waterfront in Cozumel rents for just $500 a month, while a larger two-bedroom option near the beach starts at $1,000. Inland, those prices drop even further. Mexico’s low cost of living extends to everyday expenses, such as fresh produce, dining out and travel. “Everything is more affordable, so I can dine out more and travel more,” said Woodhouse. Mexico’s proximity to the U.S. is another big advantage. English is widely spoken in popular expat hubs like San Miguel de Allende and Oaxaca, and comforts from home—from products to cultural touchstones—are readily available. France France, ranking fifth on this year’s list, is one of Europe’s most appealing countries for expats. Whether you’re drawn to France for its cuisine, its culture or its combo of country mountains and beaches, it’s a destination that offers a balance of quality and affordability. Healthcare in France is world-class, ranking among the best globally. According to International Living, Southwestern France is emerging as a top retirement spot: Pyrenees-Atlantiques towns like Oloron-Sainte-Marie and Pau offer affordable housing and natural beauty. Best Places To Move: The Rest Of The List Rounding out the top 10 countries on the International Living list are Spain, Malaysia, Greece, Italy and Thailand, each offering unique benefits for expats. Spain combines a Mediterranean lifestyle with excellent healthcare, affordable living and cultural treasures. Malaysia—the highest-ranked Asian country—has exceptional affordability, a welcoming multicultural society and modern amenities, making it an excellent choice for both retirees and digital nomads. Greece offers breathtaking landscapes, a relaxed pace of life and a low cost of living, with islands like Corfu providing a serene escape. Italy’s major appeal is its focus on the slow life, where good food and good company are at the heart of daily living (and it doesn’t hurt that many places in Italy are trying to lure foreigners with great offers for cheap housing and even paying you to live there). Finally, Thailand draws expats with its ultra-low cost of living, excellent healthcare and mix of cities and beaches. Best Places To Move: The Downside While the idea of Americans moving abroad is enticing, it’s not always welcomed with open arms. In some areas, locals have raised concerns about gentrification and its impact on housing markets and communities. “We’re aware of the pushback regarding gentrification, and it’s a valid concern,” says Stevens. “Our role is to present information responsibly, helping people integrate into communities respectfully and sustainably, while highlighting both the opportunities and the challenges of moving abroad.” Some countries have already begun addressing the unintended consequences of expat-focused policies. Portugal’s Golden Visa program, for instance, once allowed foreigners to gain long-term residence by purchasing property for as little as $250,000 while only needing to be in the country two weeks a year. “Lots and lots of people took advantage of that program,” Stevens explains. “They rent their homes out as short-term rentals—or just leave them empty—and so, of course, that served to drive up the cost of housing for locals. Now, in response, Portugal has adjusted its policies to put an end to that.” Stevens emphasizes that being a respectful and responsible expat goes a long way in fostering goodwill. “We believe strongly here at International Living that you should learn the local language where you go—you don’t have to be 100% fluent to be integrated into a community,” she says. “Not only is it respectful (after all, you’re a guest in this other country), but you’ll have a better, richer, easier experience if you speak at least a basic amount of the local language.” Ultimately, it’s up to the expats to be responsible and to make an effort to connect with their adopted communities, and in return they are often warmly welcomed. “We don’t typically see communities pushing back on the modest-income individual who goes to a town they like, rents a place for the local going rate, employs a housekeeper and gardener, hires drivers a few times a week, shops in the local markets, eats out in locally owned restaurants and volunteers at the local animal shelter or the local elementary school,” says Stevens. “That person is more integrated and is usually perceived as a welcome member of the community.” Now read on for the list of the best places to move (or retire). For a deeper dive into the best places to move, you can check out International Living’s original report . Ranked: The World’s Best Places To Move (Or Retire) MORE FROM FORBES:
Related hot word search:
Previous:
Next: 3 philippines